New AIG 30 year term product with exciting new features.

By | October 27, 2008

AIG in Canada has just released a new 30 year term life insurance product that’s very interesting. I’m going to put aside the issue most folks currently have with AIG (given the bailout of their US corporate parent). I would like to preface this with a comment though. I personally prefer 30 year term life insurance conceptually over most other types of term insurance, for most cases. I think 30 year term better fits the child rearing need, mortgages, and the need to insure younger people’s income better than say 20 year term. Nevertheless in most cases we recommend 20 year term due to cost reasons. 20 year term life insurance is roughly half the cost of 30 year term and for most cost sensitive consumers they prefer to rely on the conversion privilege if needed.

Here’s the deal with AIG’s new 30 year term. At the end of the term, it automatically renews as level term to 100 life insurance. That means level premiums for the rest of your life, guaranteed never to increase. This is a great idea they’ve got. In our younger years we want and need high levels of protection at the lowest premium we can get. 30 year term fits that need well. As we age however, our preferences tend to move towards permanent life insurance coverage. No longer are we looking at high amounts to look after our kids and dependents, we generally start thinking about leaving a legacy, covering off funeral costs and other permanent type needs. For those of you who are term believers all the way, you’ll have to trust me that in fact most people do tend to lean that way :).

The question I had was how the renewals look – the level term to 100 renewal. It turns out, they’re cost competitive with other non-level term to 100 renewals. They’re also half the price or less! of other term to 100 products available today.

Let’s run some numbers shall we? I took a 40 year old male nonsmoker, regular health for $500,000 and ran a Compulife quote for 30 year term (this is the same comparison available in the top right corner of this site – though our internal version does have some additional information that we can’t conveniently provide online). Here’s the results.

Primerica comes up number 1 at 108.30. However their product does not have a conversion option – and I cannot recommend a term product that does not have conversion (I’ve had 70 year old’s call me with life insurance that didn’t have the conversion feature – and they’re basically screwed if their health is bad).

Outside of AIG, the other three companies available are Industrial Alliance, Transamerica, and Unity. All three have conversion. However for this age, Industrial Alliance renewals are YRT (you don’t want annually increasing costs of insurance that are age based at age 70, so you’d have to convert if you wanted to maintain your insurance coverage and can’t take a medical). Transamerica and Unity Life renew level for another 10 years and 15 years respectively, at which point the policies lapse. Both of these products have renewal premiums at age 70 just the far side of $2000 for this case. So does AIG – but remember those AIG premiums remain level for life, not just for 10 or 15 years.

So in comparison to existing renewal premiums available on 30 year term life insurance, AIG’s renewals win hands down. They’re the same price or cheaper than similiar products – yet they renew level for life instead of expiring like most term products.

So now we’re 70 – how does our renewal premium look compared to what’s available at that time? Well we won’t know for 30 years, but lets compare it to what’s available today. AIG’s 30 year term again shines. The exact renewal premium is 2082.60 per month. I did a very rough present value calculation at 3% inflation (2082.60/1.03^30) and end up with a premium of $858 in today’s money. In other words, the real cost of $500,000 at age 70 for that insurance coverage is $858 if you bought it today. Now how does that compare with what’s out in the marketplace? You won’t believe this – it’s half the price. A Universal Life insurance comparison for a 70 year old for $500,000 done today (you can check this on our quote system above) is $1779 per month. And to get that premium, you’ve got to take and pass 🙂 a medical exam. Or if you had purchased the AIG product 30 years ago, you’d have access to that coverage at less than half that price at $858, and NO Medical Exam!

All in all AIG has really out done themselves with this product. I’d be in love with it and offering it to all of my clients if it weren’t for two drawbacks. The first one is as I noted, AIG’s bailout issues which has consumers skitterish, and the second one is still the large price discrepancy between 20 and 30 year term. What we need is a company that doesn’t have AIG’s perception issues to do this, with a slightly lower price differential. I would be recommending such a product to most of my clients. It would be exactly what most term purchasers need, at a viable price. And as an advisor, I’d be certain that once the coverage is in place the clients would be unlikely to need much further advice – ever! (though for you actuary types, you’d better read up on your lapse based assumptions before doing the pricing :). If the market place had such a product clients would likely never lapse such a product).

If you have questions about 30 year term, 20 year term, or any kind of term life insurance coverage, feel welcome to contact The Term Guy toll free at (866) 662-5433.

*update* I use a software database to quote all these rates. I’ve just received notice that the database was showing the renewals on Transamerica incorrectly. In fact, Transamerica’s 30 year term also renews out level to age 100, just as the AIG product does. That makes Transamerica’s 30 year term currently cost competitive with others in the marketplace. Transamerica also has a few other features that they like to promote, but it’s my opinion that the additional features are not worth any additional premium (if they’re free great, otherwise I wouldn’t pay for them).

10 thoughts on “New AIG 30 year term product with exciting new features.

  1. Pingback: Bailout » Blog Archive » New Aig 30 Year Term Product with Exciting New Features. — Term …

  2. Bob

    Primerica has a 35 year term that allows a term to term conversion with no proof of insurability….no test, no questions…. You should really do your research…

  3. Glenn Post author

    Term to term conversion is nonsense when looking at risk appraisal. Conversion in Canada means term to permanent. And it’s used by consumers if they buy term and later become uninsurable. It allows them to convert to permanent life insurance and get life insurance for the rest of their life – without a medical exam, yet at healthy rates.

    Primerica does not offer this type of conversion. End of Story. And as a result, any advisor that recommends Primerica’s term products is doing their clients a grave disservice. Most other Canadian insurers offer this term to permanent conversion at no charge at all. The only reason someone would suggest Primerica is if they don’t have a choice in what they offer.

    Primerica’s 30 year term product in Canada has YRT renewals. They increase every year. Here’s a look at the renewals you’d be looking at for the case I mentioned in the above post (these are monthly premiums):
    70: 1096.30
    75: 1753.23
    80: 2825.78
    81: 3102.23
    82: 3398.15
    85: 4457.88
    90: 6981

    That’s a representative sample. Compare that to the renewals on the AIG product, and the AIG product is clearly superior. The renewals on the Transamerica and Industrial Alliance products are superior as well – AND all three of those companies allow you to convert to a permanent product at healthy rates – without a medical exam. Primerica doesn’t.

  4. Pingback: New AIG 30 year term product with exciting new features. | insurance-canada

  5. John Smith

    Since when do people need insurance for their whole life? Your comments are spoken like a TRUE WHOLE LIFE INSURANCE salesman. Why as a financial advisor, would you suggest permanent insurance for everyone without looking at their financial situation. IF they would buy TERM insurance and invest the difference, then they would have accumulated a sizeable amount of money in their savings. Would they then need insurance if they had say $500,000 saved when their insurance expires? Let me answer this for you NO……….

  6. Glenn Post author

    I’m pretty sure I did neither of recommend permanent insurance ‘for everyone’, nor do I recommend permanent insurance ‘without looking at their financial situation’. Was the name of this blog completely lost on you?

    I suspect you’re American. Canada has mostly long progressed from the days of ‘whole life insurance’. We have far better, less expensive products that what you’re complaining about.

  7. Rob

    I am 56 years old and now totally uninsurable, I have both whole life and term and I am so glad I do. The sad reality is my term is likely going to die before me, and the company I have paid all these years will be the only beneficiaries. I had an advisor that made sure I have a good balance of both types of coverage and the awesome part of my story are my premiums are being paid TAX free on my whole life policies, with the disability waiver, all the growth within my whole life policies still allow me to collect my disability income. And I would like to add it is substantial annual growth. I hope I do live as I can access an income in later years if need be as a result of the future cost of living. And finally YES I want to leave my family tax free money because I love them. One well advised life insurance client.

  8. Glenn Post author


    You should look into the conversion privilege in your term insurance policy. It will let you switch your term insurance to permanent insurance without a medical exam. Also see here:

    Becoming uninsurable while owning term insurance is one of the primary benefits to having term to permanent conversion. That’s why it’s so important to purchase term policies that have this clause.

  9. Jeremy Robbins

    Hello I sat with someone from Primerica many years ago, and was sold a 35 year term policy. The purpose of my insurance was to help out my spouse, and vise versa in case something happened to us. We have kids and wanted everything taken care of. We were also advised by Primerica to invest, since there is NO need to have insurance when my house is paid off, and my kids have now moved out. So over all these years that have passed, me and my wife live VERY comfortably due to investing any money we had. People that need insurance for the rest of their life BASICALLY DID NOT INVEST FOR THEIR RETIREMENT!!! So for people to need a term to 100, they simply were not advised to invest. And if they did invest it was probably in a 3% GIC that doubles every 24 years, wow! ya every 24 years.
    Every financial book out their says this. Since whole life is garbage, you want the cash value they cancel your insurance, you die and family gets the insurance money and the company keeps your cash value. How fair is that, and again its in every book. Universal is a waste also. Term is the way to go, but if you invest properly you dont need a term to 100, why pay $800 to $2000 a month for that conversion, JUST INVEST IT, you will be better off.

  10. Glenn Post author

    As in many things, Jeremy, when you start with the predetermined conclusion that only term will do (and apparently, only Primerica’s term), you don’t have financial advice, you have fanaticism. Like some companies or agents only ever recommend permanent, Primarica only ever recommends term. There simply isn’t any room for the possibility of permanent insurance. And their clients get sold on this as well, gaining an irrational anger towards everything insurance.
    The reality is, neither term nor permanent insurance is always the right answer for everyone. Nor is Primerica (for one thing, just about every other company in Canada has cheaper term insurance than they do) the right answer for everyone either.
    Start with what the client needs and wants, rather than starting with ‘you must buy term insurance’. That’s no better than the ‘you must buy permanent insurance’ that Primerica is so strongly against. Actually, it’s the very same thing.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *